Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close

Candidates aim to tar rivals over the outsourcing of jobs

MugshotASSOCIATED PRESS House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif., accompanied by Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., gestures during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 30, 2010.
Social Networks
facebookFacebook
twitterTwitter

With unemployment stuck above 9 percent, Democrats have increasingly seized on outsourcing of U.S. jobs as a campaign issue, arguing the GOP's policies have encouraged companies to shift work overseas.

Republicans say a punitive corporate tax structure and burdensome federal regulations are responsible for both unemployment and outsourcing.

The only problem is that neither side can pinpoint just how much the migration of jobs is responsible for the gloomy economic picture.

"Nobody knows how many jobs have moved overseas," said Michael Montgomery, an economist with IHS Global Insight. "The reality is, the statistics aren't kept for the simple reason that it is almost impossible to gather those statistics. You can make estimates of it, but you can't prove it."

That uncertainty has left candidates and outside groups free to boil complex economics and labor flows down into a pointed blame game on the campaign trail.

The issue dominated Democrats' efforts during their short September legislative stint, as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid unsuccessfully pushed a bill designed to end tax breaks for U.S. companies that move jobs and manufacturing plants overseas. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi pushed through a bill that would raise tariffs on Chinese imports if the communist nation keeps an artificial lid on its currency.

Before leaving town, Mrs. Pelosi and House Democratic leaders also unveiled a "Make It in America" agenda that she said was aimed at "creating good-paying jobs here and not shipping them overseas."

Since then, polls have shown increasing voter anxiety over outsourcing of jobs, and China has become a common target for both parties to attack - a trend that is likely to increase after the Commerce Department released numbers on Thursday showing that the trade deficit with the Asian giant had ballooned to $28 billion in August, up from July's $25.9 billion.

The concerns over trade and outsourcing of jobs to China have been on full display in Pennsylvania, where Rep. Joe Sestak, the Democratic candidate for the state's open Senate seat, plans to meet Friday with employees of a small company near Harrisburg to speak out against the ongoing job loss and outline the steps the country can take to keep and expand employment opportunities in the state. The meeting follows a campaign ad, sponsored by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, in which a narrator claims Mr. Sestak's Republican opponent, Pat Toomey, "is fighting for jobs. In China."

"In Congress, Toomey voted to give China a special trade status. Toomey's vote for China helped cost us 2.4 million jobs. Job-killer Pat Toomey, maybe he ought to run for Senate in China," the narrator says.

Story Continues →

© Copyright 2010 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments

merrden says:

2 hours, 37 minutes ago

Mark as offensive

Lots of good comments. This old soldier has always worked excessicve hours for 30 - 40% less just to make it. One year I worked 325 days with 10 paid holidays and 3 weeks vacation and went to school as well!!! In fact for years my standard work week was 50 - 65 hours a week. I had a contract job that I worked 480 hours in about 6 weeks. Definitely not fat lazy and expecting a good living by birthright. Generation X is indeed spoiled and resembles that remark. I am 56 and having to retrain because no one wants a 56 year old tool and die/ machinist /CNC operator. A couple of my classmates are 20 or so and they may come to class and may not. Companies insist on hiring young cheap workers and get what they pay for so it is their own fault. They also hire illegal aliens who do not speak English. They cannot be trained and instructed on how to do their job correctly so mistakes are rampant. This cost my last job $2.Mil. a quarter in one operation alone. They shipped it to Mexico and a lot of other jobs as well. The Mexicans proceeded to lose every contract that they took from us because of extremely poor quality.
Both parties are to blame!!! One New York Senator that signed away 1500 jobs from his own district in a trade treaty with Peru. His reason was because it was so needful. This is typical liberal save the world redistributionist thinking. Will this Senators district reelect him? Probably because it is an extremely liberal one. China gets so much because we did not want to go to war with them so we made them a most favored trade partner. Western companies are the ones building China to a greater extent. In the end we are our own worst enemies.
Both parties fail Economics 101. You cannot get more out if you do not keep the money flowing through every pocket that you can get it to flow through. In a nut shell one mans wealth benefits many. Left alone people and companies will spend their money just to show off. When they do a lot more people get paid better wages and in turn pay TAXES!!! If you take his money up front for the government and politicians cronies (the demorats redistributionist solution) then the other classes do not get to take part in the moneys benefit in its cycle. The result is poverty and slavery for the underclass. It could be evident that this is EXACTLY THEIR PLAN!!!! We need to take back our country.

badboybaby47 says:

3 hours, 29 minutes ago

Mark as offensive

Sending JOBS overseas... OK. Who signed NAFTA into Law ? Bill Clinton !!! What has Government Motors done with TAXPAY FUNDED BAILOUT MONEY ? Even after a Government Flunky, or Car Czar , was appointed to run it ? Open an assembly plant IN MEXICO ! Keep talking " Nazi" Pelosi, just keep talking ! Oh, Dear Leader, the Chinese Workers thank you for their " green jobs " .

rider says:

6 hours, 18 minutes ago

Mark as offensive

MAX-POWER--The older GM workers are still getting an average wage of $28.00 an hour (before benefits) while not being required to have nothing more than a 12th grade education or any particular skill. Now, that's competitive, huh?

View all comment(s) on this article.

Post a comment

Title

Not Registered Yet?

Comment on articles. Receive e-mail newsletters and alerts. Sign up today.

Happening Now

Please click for more

Most Read

    Independent voices from the TWT Communities

    Forbidden Table Talk

    Political satirist and Christian apologist Bob Siegel discusses religion and politics.

    Baseball's Labyrinth

    A statistically slanted view of baseball, brought to you by a disciple of the Bill James movement.

    After Hours at The Brew Lounge

    Exploring the stories behind the passionate pursuit of great beer

    Curtain Up!

    Classical music and the performing arts: news and reviews you can use